![]() A Word of Warning about AI tools and Photo Contests.DxO PureRAW vs Topaz DeNoise vs Lightroom Summary.Which Noise Reduction Software is Best?.Noise Reduction Software Results Conclusion.Noise Reduction Software Versions in Use.Noise Reduction Software Results Comparison.What to Look for in Noise Reduction Software.What is Noise Reduction in Photography?.First though, let’s take a look at what noise and noise reduction is in photography, and why you might want to invest in a noise reduction tool like those I’m reviewing today. I’ll also look at any extra features that the software might have.Īs well as the performance and features comparison, I’m also going to go through what you should be thinking about when choosing a noise reduction application. I’ll also compare how each tool fits into your photography workflow, look at how easy they are to use, and look at how quickly they process images. Naturally I’ll be comparing the features and actual noise reduction performance of the software which I’ll do using my own images. I’m going to cover a few things in this post. My degree in computer science means I actually enjoy testing software, and I always relish the opportunity to combine two of my pleasures (computers and photography) in a review like this. I’ve spent a lot of time editing photos and trying out a range of noise reduction tools, which I use in my photography workflow on a regular basis. Whilst it’s nice to get everything right in camera, that isn’t always possible, and noise is often an unavoidable side effect of photography. Specifically, I’ll be comparing Topaz DeNoise AI 3 against On1 NoNoise AI 2023, DxO PureRAW 3, and Adobe Lightroom Classic 12.3.Īs a professional photographer who also teaches photography online, I’m always striving to get the best out of my images. In this guide, I’m going to compare some of the most popular noise reduction software applications on the market, to give you an idea of which might be best for you. I was able to capture some nice images to work with this morning on my sunrise hike in the high country.Noise reduction can be an important part of a photographer’s workflow. ![]() In addition it is possible to also export the results directly into Photoshop which brings up the ACR or lightroom module where I can adjust colors, exposure, contrast and saturation, plus all the wonderful masks and corrections that are now available in the current ACR and Lightroom products. Higher ISO images look better with Pure Raw so for those I import them one at a time into Pure Raw for processing.įrom there I click the process button to start the Pure Raw conversion which provides me with the option of selecting the Deep Prime AI conversion, the output format for which I like DNG, and a file location for the new DNG file. I don’t see much difference between ACR with Topaz and Pure Raw on lower ISO images, so I can just use ACR to process those. Once the key words have been supplied I go through the project labeling and ranking the images until I’m ready to start creating the high resolution JPG images for printing and uploading to image agencies.Īt that point I take a look at the metadata and decide whether I want to use ACR and Topaz to process the image or go to Pure Raw. At that point I can bring up Adobe Bridge to do all my key wording and initial processing for easy organization and future reference. ![]() ![]() At about a minute per image to process, it would be prohibitive to wait 2,000 minutes for a complete conversion on a big project of 2k images so I had to think hard about how to handle such a load.Įventually I decided to abandon DNG and just copy the images straight off the SD card into a raw folder on my desktop computer. However, processing is a bit slow if you want to use the Deep Prime AI model for the most benefit. Pure Raw is simple enough to use, you can browse and select or drag and drop the raw images you want process into the image window. However I have recently been won over by the cleaner sharper images produced by processing my raw images with Pure Raw. Since then Adobe came up with the subscription option and I have since then had the most current version of all the Adobe products. At that time I was unable to afford the Photoshop upgrade with the version of Camera Raw that could process the 40D so my only option at the time was Adobe DNG. Since 2007 when I bought a Canon 40D I have been using Adobe’s Digital Negative Converter to process my raw images. I’m having to adopt an entirely new workflow to accommodate DXO Pure Raw.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |